ABSTRACT
The aim of this article is to examine some of the tensions in current thinking concerning the human body: these may throw light on why, for example, despite the generally perceived usefulness of transplant technology, we remain reluctant to endorse policies which would increase organ supply. Further, given that some parts of the body appear to carry considerably more importance than others, it is my intention to look at what is held to be more shocking than what, and whether there is any rational basis for this. Are there any good reasons for privileging some organs? Should the bodies of foetuses be regarded differently from those of adults? In looking at these questions, the use of language is central-for example, the language of ‘donation’ requires closer inspection, as does the notion of recycling.
