ABSTRACT
This chapter examines the role played by economic paradigms in shaping the terms of the family and medical leave debate in the USA. It describes the use of neoclassical theory by the different coalitions advocating and opposing leave. It also describes the role and nature of empirical research used in the family and medical leave debate. Finally, it examines the philosophical and practical significance of the use of neoclassical theory to block legislation aimed at improving labor market access for employees with caregiving responsibilities.
