ABSTRACT
Terrorism studies began as a niche area of enquiry in the early 1970s within history, political science and sociology. Terrorism studies, as a whole, is becoming increasingly more empirically and quantitatively oriented after years of questionable data and science. Multiple papers have attempted to use psychoanalytical theories to explain the cause of terrorist behaviour. A. Kaplan wrote that terrorism is a response to poor self-esteem, used by an individual to counter impulses of self-contempt. Few studies have empirically tested traditional criminological theories such as anomie, strain, disorganization, or control approaches in a terrorism context. Traditional criminology seeks to identify and explain why individuals engage in criminal activity, with a focus on sociological, psychological and developmental perspectives. The rational choice perspective has been useful in understanding political violence including terrorism and literature consistently supports the presumption that terrorists are rational actors.
