ABSTRACT
This chapter offers a counterpoint to David Cannadine’s Ornamentalism by focussing on imperial ceremonial occasions and the important interventions made by materiality that came from beyond the British Empire’s frontiers. It draws attention to the ornaments in Ornamentalism by concentrating not just on representation - that is, on what the empire looked like to the British - but on what the objects meant, and particularly what they were meant to do for those resisting the British Empire. Using the methodological framework of materiality and resistance and the case study of Tibet’s 9th Panchen Lama and his visit to British-controlled India in 1905-06, this chapter counters the idea that Britain and its empire ‘represented itself to itself.’ Instead, the empirical evidence presented in this chapter shows that those who were coerced into participating in grand visualisations of empire resisted and reconfigured ceremonial occasions into images of their own making. As a result, other kinds of ornamentalism appeared and challenged what might seem to be tightly choreographed imperial spaces. In this specific case, culturally specific ornamentalism was also used to talk over the British during these widely publicised ceremonial occasions, enabling Tibetans to address other empires beyond the control of the British.
