ABSTRACT
This paper tries to bring forth the conspicuous paradox in India’s Act East implementation of connectivity projects that aim to link the country’s Northeast region with its eastern neighbours due to the existence of inner line permit in some parts of the region. While the practice of inner line permit as a colonial legacy evokes mixed sentiments, it continues to represent the protectionist discourse of a landlocked, backward and isolated region preoccupied with safeguarding their ethnic indigenous identities. This stems from the geo-strategic location of Northeast making it extremely vulnerable for infiltration from across the borders. New demands for inner line permit should also be seen in this context. In exploring the inherent contradictions of development and the prevailing protectionism, the paper argues for a sensitive, well-informed and balanced approach in dealing with these challenges.
