ABSTRACT
Feminist movements had great influence in the initial recognition of gender-based violence as a human rights issue and continue to be relevant after the adoption of norms by pointing to gaps in regulation and to deficient implementation. In consequence, human rights instruments often show an imprint of the concerns flagged by social movements and civil society. Moreover, considering that human rights treaties are “living instruments” that adapt to new social realities, paying attention to contemporary feminist claims could ensure that these treaties remain effective and compelling. This chapter explores to what extent the Istanbul Convention is in line with feminist claims held at the time of its adoption and thereafter. It offers a reflection on the potential of the Convention to adapt to changing times and to ensure the responsiveness of the gender-based violence paradigm.
