ABSTRACT
This chapter begins by putting the basic question about accommodation into focus and by outlining the range of possible responses under the law. It discusses two primary messages: first, that some accommodation should be made to selective objectors; and second, that, when feasible, self-selecting alternatives are far preferable to exemptions based on subtle criteria of eligibility. A "conscientious objector" is someone who objects in conscience to doing what is legally required. Many possible tactics for fighting wars that are widely regarded as immoral are also illegal. From the standpoint of moral blameworthiness, the genuine selective objector is in the same position as the pacifist. Deterrence and education need to be regarded from a wider vantage point than the number of people who may be discouraged from becoming selective objectors and the direct effect of that success on military efforts. The concern with fairness if selective objectors are excused is affected by whether a draft exists.
