ABSTRACT
This chapter discusses ways that Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) management guidelines can limit the potential for conflict among resource users with divergent orientations toward forest management. It considers how the ROS system can help to mitigate this conflict, and examines ways in which an incorrect and idiosyncratic ROS interpretation, illustrated by resource management planning on one National Forest, may exacerbate conflict. The ROS system addresses the diversity of recreation settings and user characteristics by providing relevant management guidelines which consider both land capabilities and recreator needs. The ROS system can therefore reduce some, but not all, forms of recreation conflict because it facilitates management that spatially separates types of users whose concurrent use of the same or adjoining areas is likely to produce goal incompatibility. ROS management may also reduce goal incompatibility by establishing or reinforcing expectations about settings and the type and quality of recreation experiences available in particular settings.
