ABSTRACT
Social forestry is tree-related production for personal and local use. In many parts of the developing world, it is more acceptable technically—socially, culturally, and economically—than large-scale forestry and agroforestry. Social forestry technologies are simple, replicable, and low-risk, and unit costs can be kept in line. A holistic approach to land use is fostered, while local participation is both possible and necessary. But initiating social forestry can be costly. "Technological packages" are highly location-specific, community development institutions may be absent or ineffective, and foresters and extension agents may be unavailable or insufficiently trained. Nonetheless, there are success stories. Hans Gregersen and Stephen McGaughey highlight their common elements, identifying factors that impede the spread of social forestry and suggesting procedures that promote that practice.
