ABSTRACT
This chapter critically examines the idea that some cinematic artworks “do philosophy.” It is argued that any interesting “film as philosophy” thesis must satisfy two conditions: (FP1) in any advance in philosophical understanding attributable to a cinematic artwork, the philosophical content through which such an advance is accomplished must be articulated in a manner that is distinctively cinematic, on a proper understanding of the latter; (FP2) the advance in philosophical understanding attributable to a cinematic artwork must occur in the course of our experiential engagement with that work, rather than in some distinct philosophical activity to which that engagement provides an extractable input. These conditions, it is argued, are not satisfied by the kinds of examples of “film as philosophy”—cinematic “thought experiments”—most often cited by philosophers. While (FP2) might be satisfied given a particular model of learning from thought experiments (FP1) remains problematic. A second more elusive possibility is that philosophical understanding is advanced through affective qualities of the experiences cinematically elicited in receivers of a narrative film. After examining how cinematic affect is generated and the kind of philosophical work that such affect might do, Robert Sinnerbrink’s notion of “cinematic thinking” is critically assessed and tested against some relevant examples.
