ABSTRACT

The two other papers you propose cashiering - viz ‘Beauty’ & ‘Thoughts on L.Wg’ [ie Letter Writing] are by no means darlings of mine, and I would say ‘let them go to the dogs too’ if their condem­ nation did not involve the sacrifice of my whole plan - namely, either now, or to be completed at some future time, the publication of two Vols - the first containing what you have inspected - the second ‘The Chaps on Churchyds’ with one or two other poetical additions. Neither of my former vols (with which I wish these to be stitched up uniformly) contains more than from 200 to 220 pages (to the best of my recollection for I have them not by me) The small edn of Southey, Crabbe, Byron, etc etc - now lying by me contains I perceive from 203 to 230 pages, and I by no means wish my Voi to exceed the thickness of these -

If he is: averse to both these propositions, I will for the present relinquish the scheme altogether ... The two papers you purpose laying aside as ‘least akin to the others’ I am desirous of inserting for that especial reason, all the rest being in the dismal strain, which I am accused of being unmercifully given to. Now I have set before you all my reasons which I suppose you will resolve into one unreason­ able argument A Woman’s wile - and if I were to talk for an hour I should only subject myself to another reflection so often cast upon us - without bringing you over to my way of thinking; So leaving you to decide as shall seem most expedient to you, I shall add no more ... (NLS 4015, ff. 229-30)

His reply cannot have been to her liking, as it was followed by a three-month silence. On 11 November she sent a letter written in the