ABSTRACT
In a number of ways, the development of nanoscience and nanotechnologies is more reflexive than was the case for earlier new and emerging sciences and technologies. Thus, we need to understand the dynamics of co-evolution, the patterns that emerge, and in particular, which overall agendas become de facto dominant. Nanotechnology risk stakeholders who were demanding precautionary approaches to nanotechnology referred to, and imagined nanotechnology dangers in terms of, Grey Goo. The health, environmental, and safety aspects of nanoparticles are now high on the agenda in the ‘nano world’. In April, the Woodrow Wilson International Center started its Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, including a study on risk and regulation of nanoparticles. The balance shifted, irreversibly, with the appearance of re-insurer Swiss Re’s report in May 2004, with its strong linking of risks of asbestos and risks of nanotubes, and nanoparticles in general.
