ABSTRACT
The methodological rationalist interpretation of rational choice theory provides a clear entry for feminist critique. For the justification for making a particular theory of rationality the default explanatory framework is that it is normatively correct. Applications of the theory typically weave together several logically independent strands of thought. The five dimensions of rational choice theory: instrumental, formal, deliberative, substantive, and rhetorical. This chapter suggests that rational choice theory in its rhetorically rich version offers both opportunities and pitfalls for feminist researchers. A particularly fruitful case to consider is Kristin Luker's study of women's decisions about their sexuality and contraceptive use, Taking Chances. Luker's project pursues two feminist aims. One is to refute the sexist assumption that women are irrational, especially with respect to decisions concerning sexuality and reproduction. A second aim is to provide an understanding of the causes of unwanted pregnancy that would enable family planning clinics and health care services to deliver contraceptives.
