ABSTRACT

Late-bourgeois art theory has been unanimous in presenting the change of scene that occurred in the late-bourgeois art of the United States at the beginning of the 1960s as if it had occurred completely spontaneously, as an art-immanent reaction to the “empty rhetoric” of Abstract Expressionism. No doubt art-immanent factors also played a part in the development of the artistic trends themselves. Although all the artistic preconditions for an art-immanent reaction to Abstract Expressionism had thus been met by the American “pioneers” in the mid-1950s, there was no initial impact. Proper notice was not taken by the late-bourgeois art world until the end of the 1950s and the early 1960s, when a series of “test” exhibitions explored the artistic possibilities that would correspond to the reoriented intentions of that world. Late-bourgeois art theory claimed, however, that it had reason to speak of pluralism at play in the late-bourgeois art world in another respect as well.