ABSTRACT
The intellectual value of diplomatic history in giving an increased appreciation of the past is thus undeniable. It needs noting that one of the concerns of traditional diplomatic history, namely the construction of timelines and chronologies, is one that typically has been easy to convert into "working truths". The seemingly nitty-gritty work of establishing when events happened and sorting them in order remains a key value that diplomatic history brings to understanding the past. Broadening the scope will enhance the value of diplomatic history by looking beyond the traditional remits of the subject. Stressing some relatively general lessons from such an expanded diplomatic history might offer lessons to learn. The importance of alternative histories and lessons should be a cure against short-sightedness, and in a wider perspective, it would fit well with a humble reading of diplomatic history, not focused on blueprints for action, but on increased understanding.
