ABSTRACT
In this chapter, the authors engage with an evolutionary debunking argument (EDA) against religious belief that appeals to cultural rather than biological evolution. According to this EDA, religious beliefs are unjustified, not because they are generated by biologically shaped cognitive processes that are unreliable as far as those beliefs are concerned, but because they are generated by cultural processes that select for those beliefs for their ability to produce prosocial behavior rather than for their truth sensitivity. Scientific beliefs, by contrast, are truth sensitive because their cultural fitness depends on their power to produce accurate predictions. Their truth sensitivity explains the great amount of convergence on them that exists across cultures. In response to the EDA in question, the authors argue that the difference between science and religion is actually more a matter of degree than a matter of kind, that there is considerable cross-cultural convergence on theistic and Christian beliefs, and that folk Christian beliefs, just as folk scientific ones, are truth-sensitive to the extent that they are constrained by expert beliefs.
