ABSTRACT

Starting from a position of accepting the inequitable distribution of power and resources as foundational causes of health inequities, this chapter explores how the equity-centred CCGHR Principles can support retrospective and critically reflective and reflexive analysis of engagement in global health research. We draw upon Shaun’s experiences as a doctoral student and Stephanie’s experiences as his doctoral studies supervisor in research exploring the intersections of HIV/AIDS and disability in Western Zambia. Exploring stereotypes and assumptions about the role of researcher (and research) in community, the chapter unpacks the ways in which systems of power served to dehumanize and undermine possibilities for meaningful contributions to equity. Unavoidable dynamics and positionalities permeated interactions between Shaun, research participants and community organizations in ways that created more distance than connections. Using reflexive practices, these tensions became a source of critical analysis, situating Shaun’s particular experiences in broader contexts and narratives. The reflexive gaze is turned onto the CCGHR Principles themselves, proposing a reorientation of how each principle sits in relationship to others. We offer recommendations on how these principles can be used flexibly and reflectively to advance more equitable engagement in the complex field of global health research.