ABSTRACT
An implicit goal of ethnomusicology is acquisition of knowledge about music—historically the music of a cultural world other than that held by the outsider ethnomusicologist prior to their study. Our methods are often sound recording and other forms of collection, and participation in musical practices. Complex issues arise when the assumptions and methods of ethnomusicology are valued differently by region, group, generation, individual, or otherwise. Likewise, complex issues arise when the ethical framework for holding knowledge in a particular cultural context is at odds with institutional and disciplinary expectations with regard to authority, publication, and ownership of knowledge, in the academy. Via two provocations–that sound recording and collection, and participation in musical practice such that the ethnomusicologist acquires knowledge that is then held in their bodies, might be compared to the actions of the Jebarra (and ancestral figure in Ngarinyin lifeworld who stole communal resources and broke the Law of sharing) – in this chapter the authors (one an outsider ethnomusicologist and one an insider researcher and cultural custodian) reconsider the ethics of outsider ethnomusicological practice. Through reflection on a 20-year history of collaboration, the chapter considers local frames for understanding the role of the work of repatriation and return, and other forms of collaboration. It finds that there are local strategies for sustaining people and place across generations despite massive periods of disruption, and that these are also deployed to manage the risks attendant with the interventions of outsiders, and makes a case for outsider and insider researchers and practitioners to consider the role of care and nurturing in research.
