ABSTRACT
A number of jurisdictions have developed systematic approaches to well-being at the heart of their strategy for the future. How do these national measures of social progress relate to cities? What are cities doing to measure the extent and intensity of social cohesion and compassion? To evaluate progress towards compassionate cities, a Compassionate Cities Index has been developed using the Alkire–Foster method with both objective and subjective indicators on psychological well-being, community vitality, ecological resilience, tolerance and inclusion, compassionate business, and other indicators. But these approaches, while welcome, are limited and focus on a modest set of indicators. For example, given the current challenges we face in cultures and society, reflected in the cities where we live, lack of trust is emerging as a key issue. Indicators need to be inclusive of this; they need to be broadened to include measures of compassion, transparency, and trust. While some indicators of these three features of social well-being exist and are being used for city and social planning, new indicators (both quantitative and qualitative) are needed. These would extend the idea of well-being as a driver for social and community development and provide a sound basis for public policy and social action.
