Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality
      loading

      Chapter

      Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality

      DOI link for Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality

      Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality book

      Anderson and Honneth through the lens of Babeuf

      Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality

      DOI link for Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality

      Redistribution and Recognition from the Point of View of Real Equality book

      Anderson and Honneth through the lens of Babeuf
      ByJean-Philippe Deranty
      BookParadigms of Justice

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2020
      Imprint Routledge India
      Pages 23
      eBook ISBN 9781003099932
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Elizabeth Anderson and Axel Honneth both propound ‘relational’ models of equality and freedom to criticize mainstream distributivist theories of justice. Anderson does this by retrieving the republican and Honneth the socialist tradition. Yet both traditions also focused on another key concern of justice, namely ‘real equality’. The chapter begins by comparing Anderson’s and Honneth’s models, and what the overlaps and differences between them mean for issues of recognition and redistribution. In the second part, the chapter turns to the writings of Gracchus Babeuf, the most radical and consistent defender of ‘real equality’, to highlight shortcomings in Anderson’s and Honneth’s own theories of justice.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited