ABSTRACT
The author considers the role of synchronicity in the establishment of meaning in analysis and links it to the notion of moments of meeting proposed by the Boston Process of Change Study Group. In so doing, he proposes to view synchronicity as an element in developmental processes, wherein attributions of meaningfulness are made in relation to patterns of action that do not have intrinsic meaning, but which have evolved in an environment of meaning, thereby bootstrapping the infant into the world of meaning. Jung’s paradigmatic example of synchronicity—the scarab beetle event—is examined in this context, and the argument is made that the event was primarily meaningful for Jung and carried with it important countertransference implications that Jung did not consider. The paper concludes with some suggestions for further investigation into the relationship between synchronicity and clinical practice.
