ABSTRACT
Populist movements arose in the Global South during the colonial period as nationalist leaders challenged the dominant power structure and emphasized democratic rule. However, after achieving independence, many of these leaders assumed absolute power, ignored the rule of law, stifled challenges to their rule, and engaged in corrupt practices to maintain their grip on power by resorting to clientelist politics, cronyism, and patronage. Bangladesh is presented as a unique case, with swings between democratic populism and authoritarian rule. The different regime types of populism and non-populism have exhibited diverse attributes, depending on their origin, policy stance, and operating style. Populist leaders have tended to be insensitive to citizens’ rights and liberties, and their reliance on clientelism, cronyism, and apathy towards corruption have helped them achieve their political objectives. Hostile personalities, Machiavellianism, and arbitrariness are common features of populist politics in Bangladesh.
