ABSTRACT
Recent studies have demonstrated that ratio standards, i.e. the simple division of a performance variable by an anthropometric measure, do not adequately partition out body size differences from young people’s peak oxygen uptake (peak https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> V ˙ O 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315025001/ca0a1b50-16e7-4532-9e85-fe2cd38f2327/content/inline-eqn302_B.tif" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/> ) and that allometric scaling techniques are preferable[1, 2]. Studies describing allometric relationships between young people’s body size and ventilation ( https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> V ˙ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315025001/ca0a1b50-16e7-4532-9e85-fe2cd38f2327/content/inline-eqn303_B.tif" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/> E) at peak https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> V ˙ O 2 https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781315025001/ca0a1b50-16e7-4532-9e85-fe2cd38f2327/content/inline-eqn304_B.tif" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/> are sparse[3, 4] and allometric studies of ventilatory responses to submaximal exercise appear to be non-existent. No previous investigation has explored ventilatory responses in relation to maturation, with body size controlled for using allometric techniques.
