ABSTRACT
The AIDS epidemic has presented many new ethical dilemmas regarding psychologists’ obligations to their clients and third parties. Both ethical and legal norms remain unsettled in regard to most of these dilemmas. In general, psychologists should strive to protect the privacy of their clients and to promote the welfare of individuals affected by AIDS. When compelling interests of third parties lead to a different result, intrusions on clients’ interests should be no greater than necessary. Although a lack of training about AIDS may limit psychologists’ competence and constrict their duties to people with AIDS, the duty remains for clinicians to obtain training to remediate such gaps in knowledge or skills and to advocate for resources and protection from discrimination for people affected by AIDS.
