ABSTRACT
Effects of the motivation for closure are assumed to be monotonic along the continuum. The motivation toward cognitive closure may affect the way individuals process information en route to the formation, alteration, or dissolution of knowledge. At a minimum, the seizing and freezing mechanism implies a reduced extent of information processing under a heightened need for closure. This chapter argues that, commonalities with alternative formulations notwithstanding, the need for closure construct is unique and fundamentally different from previous relevant notions in its essence, antecedent conditions, and consequences. The very notion of situational antecedents contrasts sharply with previous formulations of closed-mindedness and open-mindedness in terms of personality typologies. The chapter examines work pertaining to permanence phenomena as such, followed by research on the boundary conditions for urgency versus permanence effects. In accordance with the theory, the quest for in-group consensus due to the permanence tendency may inspire stronger in-group favoritism and protectionism under a heightened need for closure.
