ABSTRACT
Today, in urban social debates, considerable attention is given to residential segregation issues. Not just the ethnic and socio-economic contrasts among different groups in society but particularly the spatial dimension tend to appeal to a wide audience. Although there is insufficient knowledge about the consequences of segregation, it is presumed that residential segregation is undesirable and that it is a major cause of social problems in cities. People assume that clear segregation prevents full participation in society and, therefore, fear spatial inequality, especially if it is rigid. Following this line of reasoning it appears logical that several countries have taken measures to resolve spatial inequalities. However, if solutions for 'segregation problems' are sought, the 'causes' should be known and understood. Without a proper understanding of the mechanisms related to segregation there cannot be an appropriate response to segregation. Here, we will offer a contribution to such understanding by presenting part of an empirical analysis of a broader international comparative research project that deals with segregation and the welfare state.
