ABSTRACT
This chapter explores the wildlife crime/security nexus by drawing on perspectives within theories on discourse, discretion, and deterrence. The discussion builds on previous observations of a disconnect between the authoritarian approach associated with the ‘war on wildlife crime’ and the everyday enforcement problems highlighted by officers in the East African state of Uganda. It focusses on some key issues in securitisation, seeking to discuss the appropriateness and implications of the combative rhetoric and the growing demand for repressive and militarised strategies in conservation policies. Taking inspiration from Childress’ (2001: 195) broader work on war as metaphor in public policy, this chapter asks: ‘Does [the military metaphor] generate insights, or does it obscure what is going on, and what should be done’?
