ABSTRACT
This chapter aims to recover a policy for the use of collective memory in U.S. transatlantic relations from the late Cold War through the mid-1990s. First, it surveys the existing scholarship on the topic, and critiques some of its methodological models. It continues with an analysis of the United States Information Agency’s overseas commemorative programming for the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution as a case study of the uses of collective memory in late Cold War U.S. transatlantic relations. This is followed by an analysis of how the Clinton White House used the memory of the end of World War Two at its 50th anniversaries in 1994–1995 as commemorative diplomacy. While for much of the post-Cold War period it had in place an apparatus to use historical anniversaries and commemorations as part of its diplomacy, the post-Cold War U.S. administrations both diminished this toolkit and did not always manage to make good use of its resources in their transatlantic relations. The lack of a coherent and focused official policy in the United States government made for a rather uneven and uninspired use of memory for transatlantic diplomacy in the 1990s – and thus it reflected not only the changing global challenges for American foreign policy, but also the government’s difficulties in articulating a new role for the United States in the world.
