ABSTRACT
The model of comparative philosophy implies that two philosophies (or more) are lined up side by side and common features are extracted which are then compared with regard to more subtle distinctions. (Such philosophies can also be contrasted for differences as the main extra-philosophical activity.) It is not altogether clear what benefits accrue from such an activity in addition to the “ feel-good” factor of having been politically correct in showing an aware ness of multiple cultures or the “ show-off” factor of having displayed one’s academic prowess. A more generous onlooker to the comparativist’s activities might aver that the comparativist and her or his reader would also broaden theirminds through coming into contact with viewpoints that differ from their own. However, unless the comparativist actively incorporated different view points into her or his own, the comparison/contrast in itself would only afford intellectual benefits. Such an incorporation of viewpoints (or a disgorgement of one’s own previously held viewpoints) would be extrinsic to the activity of comparison/contrast and would not constitute part of the goal or process of such comparison/contrast.
