Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens
      loading

      Chapter

      Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens

      DOI link for Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens

      Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens book

      Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens

      DOI link for Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens

      Who Stole the Child?: Missing Babies and Blank Identities in Early Dickens book

      ByGalia Benziman
      BookDickens and the Imagined Child

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2015
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 16
      eBook ISBN 9781315577043
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Throughout his career, Charles Dickens was fascinated by the figure of the child as signifier of tentative selves and unstable social identities. This interest is already manifest during the early stages of his journalistic and literary career. As Boz, and specifically in Oliver Twist (book publication 1838), Dickens uses the blank child’s susceptibility to alternative social labels as a powerful narrative device that allows for a series of psychological and socio-political dilemmas to rise to the surface. These dilemmas are worked out through Dickens’s choice of generic forms, or rather through his inconsistent use of such forms. Interestingly, his representation of the child tends to involve a leaning toward fairy tale and fantasy. The inclination to abandon realism in favour of fantasy, replacing direct social critique with melodramatic plot devices and fairy-tale solutions, has led certain critics to view Dickens’s early work as relatively naïve and less politically sophisticated than his later novels. I suggest, however, that in his depiction of the child’s susceptibility to shifting social definitions it is this generic inconsistency that enables Dickens to voice a particularly pointed and effective critique of social structures.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited