ABSTRACT

Gone are the days when it was controversial, or simply befuddling, to declare an interest in both psychoanalysis and geography. Perhaps this change has to do with geographers’ enduring engagements with psychoanalytic thought: a conversation that can be traced back to the 1930s and even earlier (see Cameron and Forrester, this book; also Matless 1995). Exchanges between geography and psychoanalysis, moreover, have not been one-sided. For its part, psychoanalytic thought, in its inception, has consistently drawn on geographical ideas to explicate its own concepts and practices.