Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism
      loading

      Chapter

      The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism

      DOI link for The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism

      The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism book

      The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism

      DOI link for The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism

      The historical compromise between “civil state” and religion in post-revolutionary Arab neo-constitutionalism book

      ByYADH BEN ACHOUR
      BookReligions and Constitutional Transitions in the Muslim Mediterranean

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2016
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 15
      eBook ISBN 9781315605074
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      A compromise may be achieved in many ways. We may ignore the competing positions, without deciding specifically in favor of one or the other. A middle position can be adopted, which is relatively easy in the case of only two competing positions. Alternatively, a third position which is closer to one or the other of the initial positions can be adopted. Or, finally, we can simultaneously opt for both of the original positions. This option is far more like a stalemate, one made in anticipation of further and more accurate decisions on the matter. All of these modalities or models of compromise have been tried in Tunisia over the course of the post-revolution years.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited