Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension
      loading

      Chapter

      Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension

      DOI link for Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension

      Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension book

      Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension

      DOI link for Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension

      Individual Differences In Multiple Document Comprehension book

      BySarit Barzilai, Helge I. Strømsø
      BookHandbook of Multiple Source Use

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2018
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 18
      eBook ISBN 9781315627496
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      This chapter aims to review current research on individual differences in multiple documents (MD) comprehension and to discuss the implications of these differences for educational research and practice. Models of MD comprehension describe how readers construct coherent mental representations based on documents that present diverse accounts regarding a particular issue. The chapter addresses several cognitive differences that have been found to play a role in MD comprehension: reading fluency, working memory, prior knowledge, prior beliefs, and strategic processing. An important component in text comprehension is readers' identification of semantic connections between different pieces of information in the text, and also between that information and readers' prior knowledge. Contemporary models of text comprehension all include prior knowledge as a critical factor in readers' construction of meaning from text. Epistemic criteria and standards enable evaluating the quality and reliability of one's own or others' knowledge representations.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited