ABSTRACT
The strength of mixed methods research (MMR) is inherent in the integration of qualitative and quantitative data to answer research questions with both depth and breadth in ways that could not be achieved through the application of only one of these approaches. MMR is uniquely applicable to art therapy research because it provides an approach that is congruent with art therapists’ ways of knowing and holds promise for moving the field forward with philosophical and methodological integrity. In this chapter the paradigm of pragmatism that underlies MMR is discussed, as are the skills necessary for conducting studies using this approach. Six MMR designs (convergent parallel, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, intervention/embedded, social justice, and multiphase program evaluation) are described and illustrated with published art therapy examples. Approaches for evaluating the quality of MMR studies are elucidated, and strengths and shortcomings of this methodology are brought to light.
