ABSTRACT
This chapter explores the selection and choice of formal policy analysis methods from several vantage points. It begins by looking at the influence of formal methods on the development of policy analysis as a distinct field and on the profession of policy analysis and advising. The precise role of formal methods depends on practices that vary from place to place and over time. A brief discussion of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of these widely used formal methods, and describes their contribution to policy advisory work. The chapter considers the changing nature of policy analysis practices, including, implications for the use of formal and other methods, models, frameworks and other tools and techniques in the policy adviser's repertoire, drawing on experiences from New Zealand by way of illustration. While the trend of formal methods emerged in the US, similar approaches were adopted in other countries.
