ABSTRACT
Max ought to go to the kitchen table, in the ‘ought of reasons’ sense. At the same time, given his false belief about the whereabouts of his chocolate, he ought to go to the kitchen cupboard, in the ‘ought of rationality’ sense. In other words, two-concept theorists would need to argue that there is a distinctive sense in which ‘motivating reasons’ are themselves normative! This would provide us with a way to find the explanatory role of rationalizing attitudes independently intelligible, with no reliance on what disjunctivists take to be the ‘good case’.
