ABSTRACT

This chapter discusses the most direct and coherent response to poststructuralist and postcolonial critiques as leveled in particular by Jennifer Robinson, Ananya Roy, and others. An unfortunate one-sided representation of the ‘global cities research’ (GCR) literature is prevalent in many postcolonial and ‘ordinary city’ writings on globalized urbanization. Jennifer Robinson’s postcolonial critique of GCR has clearly been a catalyst for a part of the field to distance itself from GCR. Ironically, reducing GCR to global city rankings or league tables – besides often resting on a misrepresentation of that exercise – is to take one particular line of research to stand for the whole. Moreover, the urban-economic geographies under scrutiny stretch well beyond the global city shortlists as they explicitly probe the contours of the world city network by studying world-city formation beyond the ‘old core’.