ABSTRACT
This chapter highlights the availability of a growing breadth and depth of assessment material for juvenile firesetting/arson. Risk assessment practice has been described as entering its 'third generation', distinguished from earlier forms by practices that reflect structured decision-making (SDM) or structured professional judgement (SPJ) models. Both SDM and SPJ practices rely upon risk frameworks that are supported by research literature, easily incorporated into practice, allow for flexibility for individual factors, and quantify evaluation data and clinical impressions. Dr. David Kolko deveoped the Services Aimed at Fire Education and Treatment for Youth (SAFETY) Programme at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. SAFETY offers comprehensive evaluation and the opportunity for children and families to participate in fire safety education, child and parent skills training, family therapy and additional services as needed. A review of juvenile arson intervention programmes in Australia noted high levels of satisfaction by parents after their child's participation and lowered levels of recidivism.
