Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management
      loading

      Chapter

      Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management

      DOI link for Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management

      Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management book

      Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management

      DOI link for Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management

      Legal Frameworks for Collaboration in Governance and Public Management book

      ByLisa Blomgren Bingham
      BookBig Ideas in Collaborative Public Management

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2008
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 23
      eBook ISBN 9781315706146
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      In A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. et al. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935, affectionately known as “the Sick Chicken case”), the U.S. Supreme Court faced a challenge to the work product of collaborative public management. A New York poultry dealer was convicted of violating regulations adopted pursuant to the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1934 (NIRA, New Deal legislation) for letting customers select individual chickens for kosher slaughter from a coop or lot. The Court observed that the national crisis of the Depression “demanded a broad and intensive cooperative effort by those engaged in trade and industry, and that this necessary cooperation was sought to be fostered by permitting them to initiate the adoption of codes” (295 U.S. at 529). However, the Court noted that this cooperation

      involves the coercive exercise of the law-making power. The codes of fair competition which the statute attempts to authorize are codes of laws. If valid, they place all persons within their reach under the obligation of positive law, binding equally those who assent and those who do not assent. Violations of the provisions of the codes are punishable as crimes.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited