Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes

Chapter

Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes

DOI link for Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes

Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes book

Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes

DOI link for Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes

Barriers and borders: London’s legacy development ambitions and outcomes book

ByRALPH WA R D
BookThe London Olympics and Urban Development

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2015
Imprint Routledge
Pages 13
eBook ISBN 9781315758862

ABSTRACT

In the years leading up to the thirtieth modern Olympiad, the official discourse of London 2012 was dominated not by athletics but by the prospect of urban regeneration in East London and by the possibility of mass participation in a community-building process. This chapter suggests that London 2012's officialdom did not credit the wider population with the level of discrimination required to appreciate the Games as the pinnacle of sporting achievement. Instead they made the assumption that most Londoners would remain consumed with self-interest, only supporting the Games if they thought that the Games were going to do something for them; moreover, something of economic or other tangible benefit. The chapter shows that in East London local people were equivocal in their response to London 2012, first in prospect and then in its development. It also shows that whether for or against London 2012, their responses were often qualified by awareness of counter arguments and contrary opinion.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited