ABSTRACT
The goal of this article is to present a methodological critique of the 1998 meta-analysis of child sexual abuse outcomes by Rind, 136Tromovitch, and Bauserman. Seven major concerns are addressed. Rind et al.’s view is, at best, extremely limited. By restricting a supposedly broad meta-analysis to only some of the population in question, the conclusions they drew regarding this complex topic, primarily that adult-child sex is not necessarily harmful, are invalid. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: <getinfo@haworthpressinc.com> Website: <https://www.HaworthPress.com> © 2001 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights resented.]
