ABSTRACT
It is often lamented by academics and others that contemporary patterns of consumption are “post-modern” (see e.g. Van Raaij 1993). Some perceive of consumption in general as post-modern (Jameson 1988). Its volatility and fickleness is such that it is beyond understanding. In this paper I argue that the characterization of contemporary consumption patterns as post-modern is based on an incorrect understanding of these consumption patterns, as well as an incorrect understanding of the term post-modernity. Underlying present-day consumption patterns are broadly supported socio-cultural values that, the literature on modernism and post-modernism indicates, are thoroughly modernist in nature. Modernist values such as autonomy, novelty, speed, success, and uniqueness underlie consumption patterns. In their consumption, people want to express such values. The volatility and fickleness of consumption patterns is, as I will argue in this short paper, to be explained by reference to the modernist values involved, and by the fact that the modernist values often contradict one another, particularly when expressed in the consumption of concrete objects. The paradoxes that are inherent in modern consumption, particularly as consumption patterns are institutionalized to allow for communication, give rise to the kind of patterns we see today.
