Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Egalitarianism as an active process
      loading

      Chapter

      Egalitarianism as an active process

      DOI link for Egalitarianism as an active process

      Egalitarianism as an active process book

      Legitimacy and distributed power in Iron Age West Africa

      Egalitarianism as an active process

      DOI link for Egalitarianism as an active process

      Egalitarianism as an active process book

      Legitimacy and distributed power in Iron Age West Africa
      ByStephen A. Dueppen
      BookAlternative Iron Ages

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2019
      Imprint Routledge
      Pages 24
      eBook ISBN 9781351012119
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Archaeologists increasingly recognise the significance of non-centralised forms of complexity and employ diverse theoretical frameworks to understand their origins and dynamics, including explorations of cooperation, communalism and egalitarian strategies in political systems. This chapter focuses on the practices and institutions by which more horizontally organised political systems were integrated in Iron Age West Africa, and in doing so, considers the material indicators of strategies employed by these communities. Kirikongo, Burkina Faso (ca. 100–1700 AD) provides an excellent case study, as the community rejected a centralised political system in the twelfth century AD and constructed a new society based upon more egalitarian principles, enabling comparison of the different political strategies in use at different times. The egalitarian socio-political structure at Kirikongo was created through the division of power rooted in ritually potent sources among multiple social groups (including new craft specialist groups) coupled with the creation of diverse cross-cutting integrative mechanisms, including economic interdependency, collective actions, shared practices, and open spatial syntax. Data from Kirikongo indicate that like the exclusionary strategies of centralised systems, non-centralised polities are actively constructed, constantly legitimised, intricately structured to avoid inequalities, and result in positive indicators of human actions that are materially identifiable in the archaeological record.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited