ABSTRACT
Before commenting on the strong chapter by Connell and Kubisch, as well as the larger issues they and others raised, I wish to make explicit up front that my comments come out of three recent experiences. First, efforts to help communities understand how they impact their youth’s development: How do we, as professionals who study youth development, help communities become more intentional about their support of children and youth? Second, efforts to systematically evaluate such efforts: If we are to learn from what communities are trying, we must be able to establish evaluation systems that not only capture the impact of neighborhoods but also the impact of initiatives designed to improve the development of all children and youth within those “villages.” And finally, direct observations of how the Community Action Framework for Youth Development is being applied to the 20-year initiative noted in their chapter. These experiences, often done in the framework of Search Institute’s 40 assets youth need to succeed, have shaped my thinking and informed my perspectives.
