ABSTRACT
This chapter focuses on the contrast between ethical positions set forth in publications within the field, and more typical perspectives in society and among ethicists with respect to how and on what basis conduct is judged to be ethical or unethical. It considers the manner in which an ethics code is characteristic of a profession. The chapter argues that Van Houten et al'. s position does not include a systematic and broader analysis of what ethics are, and how they might apply to treatment of children or adults with autism or other developmental disabilities or other members of society. The American Psychological Association (APA) promulgates ethical standards for its members. These ethical standards include competence, integrity, professional and scientific responsibility, concern for others' welfare, and social responsibility. In addition to broad and aspirational ethical standards, the APA also promulgates specific ethical standards that prohibit or require certain specific actions from psychologists.
