ABSTRACT

A tribunal will concern itself with proof of the exercise of sovereignty at the critical date or dates, and in doing so will not apply the orthodox analysis to describe its process of decision. The issue of territorial sovereignty, or title, is often complex, and involves the application of various principles of the law to the material facts. The result of this process cannot always be ascribed to any single dominant rule of ‘mode of acquisition’. The orthodox analysis does not prepare the student for the interaction of principles of acquiescence and recognition with the other rules.10