Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback
                           1

Chapter

Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback 1

DOI link for Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback 1

Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback 1 book

Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback 1

DOI link for Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback 1

Evaluating Reliance on Combat Identification Systems: The Role of Reliability Feedback 1 book

ByHeather F. Neyedli, Lu Wang, Greg A. Jamieson, Justin G. Hollands
BookHuman Factors Issues in Combat Identification

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2010
Imprint CRC Press
Pages 16
eBook ISBN 9781315587387

ABSTRACT

This chapter explores factors that affect reliance on combat identification (CID) systems, with the end goal of helping soldiers to use the systems more effectively and reduce fratricide incidents. A variety of technical solutions have been developed to improve soldiers CID performance. The chapter examines the effectiveness of using aid reliability information to support appropriate reliance on a simulated, rifle mounted, and CID system. It describes test the feasibility of using response bias as an indication of participants' reliance on the CID aid. In the systems, soldier is equipped with a gun-mounted interrogator and a helmet-mounted transponder. The chapter examines whether informing participants about the reliability of the aid affected participants' reliance on the aid. A participant's decision to rely on the aid more often than ignoring it may be appropriate, especially in the case where the aid outperforms manual control.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited