ABSTRACT

After the invasion of Iraq, in the wake of the failure to uncover weapons of mass destruction or any link between Iraq and Al Qaeda or the events of 9/11, accusations of “threat inflation” became commonplace, with scholars arguing that the Bush administration pumped up the Iraq threat beyond the facts available and made arguments based on far-fetched worst case scenarios (Kaufmann 2004; Cirincione 2005; Prados 2004; Hersh 2003). Worse, many observers believe the administration was extremely successful in its efforts to build public support for war on false grounds.