Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa

Chapter

Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa

DOI link for Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa

Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa book

Cognitive models and the dynamic past

Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa

DOI link for Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa

Homesteads, pots, and marriage in southeast southern Africa book

Cognitive models and the dynamic past
ByGavin Whitelaw
BookCognitive Archaeology

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2019
Imprint Routledge
Pages 32
eBook ISBN 9781315157696

ABSTRACT

The Iron Age sequence east of the Drakensberg and south of the uPhongolo River dates from ad 450 to the onset of the colonial period at, say, ad 1820. This sequence is conventionally divided in two at ad 1060. There are significant differences in the material culture of the two periods, and it now seems widely accepted that the late period marks the settlement of Nguni speakers in the region. Settlement pattern evidence strongly suggests that agriculturists of both periods were patrilineal and married through the exchange of cattle for wives. The focus here is on the differences. A high exchange value for women (relative to average cattle holdings) between ad 650 and 1060 meant that enduring relations between cattle-linked siblings—wives and their brothers—posed a significant challenge to the ambitions of homestead-heads. By contrast, evidence from the period ad 1300–1650 suggests that agnatic clusters were more isolated, that the exchange value of women was low, that relations between wives and their natal households were de-emphasized, and that there was a corresponding emphasis on the authority of the homestead-head.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited