ABSTRACT
I shall not make a point by point commentary on Professor Lockwood’s paper on the traditional worker. Nor do I want to disinter his earlier paper yet again in detail: he himself confessed to an avuncular rather than a paternal interest in that. But I do want to take up a few general issues that arise partly from several of the contributions to the symposium, partly from David Lockwood’s commentary; and to start from some of the points in his original paper and his remarks about it above.
